Hello folks! how are you doing? Well, it seems the following video has been censored (at least for me, along with most search engines and chat sites 
If it is for you, simply look it up and see if you can find it elsewhere. You know what censorship entails folks? More fuel to the ammo presented here, that which is closer to the truth that they fear, so stock up and get on it an all levels.
2.
I find it a very useful yoga when I wake up every day to ask myself... "Am I a useful idiot?" You never know.
My definition of a useful idiot:
It refers to the mislead individuals through out the compartmentalized structure of society, government, military, religion, and mafia the world over (usually people that aren't necessarily idiots, or ill intending, but unfortunate to be simply brainwashed, misinformed, naive, and or ignorant to facts due to being indoctrinated with propaganda through the mass media, public education, and other vectors) who believe and act what they are told, regardless of how they feel internally. Regardless how how large, small, horrible, corrupt, and weak their missions, or masters actually are;
Its never too late for change. To know the truth is to have the power not be afraid and ignorance is regret just waiting to happen, so get active.
3.
|=================================================================================
Please do your the research and verify these findings:
Jack Blood of gcnlive.com interviews Richard Andrew Grove, an AIG insider and whistleblower.
Here is the link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6546044203900048624
Get the archive at Gcnlive.com. Also check out these sites: [B]8thestate.com DeadlineLive.info JackBlood.com
JackBloodForum.com
|=================================================================================
Here are some more articles that follow the bread crumb trail that lead to our current crisis:
The Secret (Insurance) Agent Men[/B]
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/sep/22/news/mn-25118
Greenberg Making a Play for AIG?[/B]
http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/09/16/aig-insurance-greenberg-biz-wall-cx_lm_0916aigupdate3.html
The liar-in-chief hard sells the bailout[/B]
By Jerry Mazza (Sept 26 2008)
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3797.shtml
9/11 and the Greenberg Familia
By Jerry Mazza[/B] (Sept 29 2006)
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1261.shtml
Blogs: Peter Dale Scott[/B] (more whistle blowing and behind the scenes information about AIG and other frauds)
http://wordpress.com/tag/peter-dale-scott/
|=================================================================================
This is very relevant to our time and a good read:
Letter: 'Banksters' increase oil costs[/B]
Four dollars and two cents a gallon. Saying "unbelievable" would be a lie.
In 1971, Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister, who wrote "The Non-Energy Crisis" while chaplain on/during the Alaskan oil pipeline construction, sat in on the secret meetings, where a top oil company, World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) executives met to establish "before the fact" future prices. Why should this interest anyone/everyone?
Peak oil affects every nation and almost every person in the world. Seeking a multi-level item that would affect not just one area, transportation, but all householders, businesses, and health providers - poor and rich alike - the common denominator chosen was oil. Whether through transportation, commonly used items, health, environment, daily life or enjoyment, oil is involved.
Gasoline is only one part of "oil." Nations can rise or fall, depending on oil. The Bush family's interests and old connections with terrorists before Iraq were involved in oil. Oil equals money. Money equals banksters.
Oil company executives were pawns as are you and I. World control is through hidden financiers who in 1913 set up the Federal Reserve Bank (Act), stripping our nation of its wealth through use of created Monopoly-type "notes" with their "promise to pay," after doing away with gold and silver, which formerly backed our Treasury-created paper money.
A booklet, "Billions for the Bankers, Debt for the People," in simple language told of the banksters' scheme.
Our dead carcass nation, eaten inside out by financial leeches, still externally shows the U.S.A. as a beautiful entity, once admired and followed, now hated by the world at large, is leading lemming nations into destruction. Financiers' planned-for predictions of many years ago are coming to fruition. Four dollars and two cents a gallon. Heck, that's only the start.
Ann Stoddard
|=================================================================================
The Law of Thermodynamic Economics + A.I.G Insider Spills
Thermodynamic Economics
From Edward Deak
I started reading economics in '82 and by '85 I came to the inescapable conclusion, later supported by many scientist friends and never broken by anybody, that: Monetary economic efficiency doesn't exist and the only economic efficiency is the thermodynamic one. Therefore, costs can not be cut by monetary manipulations, only through the reduction of physical inputs of resource/energy.
The "law" I wrote was:
A Principle for the application of physical efficiency to economics:
THE REAL, OR PHYSICAL COSTS OF A PRODUCT, OR SERVICE ARE CONSTANT
An efficient product contains physically efficient or ideal amounts of energy and matter, regardless of numerical or monetary considerations. Monetary cost efficiency can not exist outside the concepts of physical efficiency and becomes a cost transfer on other sectors. Therefore it is not efficiency, but temporary convenience. Nothing can be made "cheaper" than the limits of physical efficiency of "no waste".
Fiduciary money is a concept, not a reality and can not overrule the laws of physical, or ecological efficiency. Somebody, something, sometime, somewhere must pay the full costs.
In the past 13 years I have never had the slightest reason to change this. The reason that I concentrated on the concept of efficiency was that if and when the true laws of economic efficiency are recognized and implemented, virtually all the problems caused by the present false concepts will be eliminated. It won't bring Nirvana and to a great
extent it will mean cutting back on many things we now accept as part of the system, therefore it will bring on the loss of certain luxuries. However, because of the simplicity involved in the application of "low resource inputs to reach certain targets" can be understood by anyone and there's no argument about them.
-All the very best, Ed (Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC)[/B]
|=================================================================================
Monday, January 15, 2007
Principles of Community Based Economics[/B]
We live in an economic and political world characterized by several overarching themes. First, the need for ever-increasing and faster economic "growth". Second, a rapidly increasing scale in terms of the size and power of business and government. Finally, the continuous concentration of wealth and power in the hands of fewer and fewer.
Over the past 200 or so years, politics has focused on ideological systems relating to forms of ownership and simplistic principles of economics. This is most often referred to as the left-right political spectrum. At times it is expressed as socialism vs. capitalism. The problem is that both ends of this spectrum use material wealth and its method of distribution as the basis for the system.
A third way focuses on outcomes, and the priority of people over systems. It makes material wealth and economics the servant, not the end in itself. The focus becomes community. This is most commonly known as community based economics. Community based economics stands in contrast to that which would usurp, exploit and destroy our community and our environment.
Community based economics can be characterized by four key ideas.
1. Scale down.[/B]
By now we should all be aware of the problems related to consuming food from thousands of kilometers away, and the effect this has on local producers, and our own health. Also, those of us who work for large, impersonal corporations may be acutely aware that we are simply "working for the man"; that the job is insignificant and going nowhere. Much of this stems from the "bigger is better" mentality. The result is often the far flung economic enterprise of amoral multinational corporations.
In 1973, Theodore Roszak provided a good description of what would later be called community-based economics:
a libertarian political economy that distinguishes itself from orthodox socialism and capitalism by insisting that the scale of organization must be treated as an independent and primary problem. Bigness is [its] nemesis ... whether the bigness is that of public or private bureaucracies, because from bigness comes impersonality, insensitivity, and a lust to concentrate abstract power. While smaller scale does not guarantee subjective, democratic, community control, it is fairly safe to say that large-scale, distant, remote ownership precludes it.
2. Slow down[/B]
Our current economic reality can be likened to a treadmill where someone turns the speed up a notch each year. Indeed the basic theory of our economic system dictates that we must have this ever increasing and faster "growth". More money changing hands each year is somehow assumed to mean more prosperity and quality of life. A closer look reveals that this is often not the case. We spend our time and energy trying to accumulate more "stuff", always feeling like we're short of money, then one day we realize that our kids are grown up and gone and the SUV's rusted out.
Under our current system, economic theory has moved from being a tool; a means to an end, and has become the end in itself. Ultimately we sacrifice personal and community growth for economic growth. Economics should be used to facilitate personal and community growth.
3. Democratize[/B]
Generally there are two streams of thought on this matter. The first says that citizens should run the show. The second says that the average citizen is not intelligent enough to inform decisions of community importance. I know some people personally who freely admit being in the second group. Traditionally this divide has contributed to the underlying values of Canadian political parties. 150 years ago, when Canadian society was largely based on a class structure, the privileged class wielded political power on behalf of the "dumb masses". Unfortunately much of this class structure has remained in our two dominant political entities, the Liberal and Conservative parties. The former Reform party, and currently the Greens represent the other side of the "power" debate, believing in participatory democracy, and electoral reform.
4. Decentralize.[/B]
Often this word sends chills down the spine of power-protective politicians. Many in the past have tried to discredit the idea of decentralization based on efficiency arguments and a perceived need for national stability. What our overly centralized system has gotten us is exactly what its proponents said it would not; a sense of alienation and separatist movements in various regions of the country, and a lack of efficiency due to bloated bureaucracies.
What is needed instead is a decentralization of economic and political systems to counter the current concentration of wealth and power. With this would come a diversification of forms; things being done differently in different places to match the local reality. This is not to say that everything should or can be done on a local level. All levels of government have their role. What is currently needed however is a counterbalance to the current overemphasis on higher levels of government and the over-concentration of power. By allowing various regions of the country more power in directing their destinies we would quickly see the separatist movements melt away and local economies improve.
If you're still skeptical, do your own test. Think about some of the major challenges we currently face in our society such as climate change, lack of job quality, exploitation of labour, breakdown of relationships. Ask yourself how these issues would fare under the changes described above. Ultimately these ideas represent a move toward sustainability; a better balance between our natural environment, technology, and people.
The current dominant system of perpetual economic growth stands in contrast to the need for deep community and living more lightly on the earth. Can we change in time?
A discussion on economics generally make my eyes glaze over, but I am increasing coming to believe that folks like Ed (and Shane) are correct when they say that we must not let the "economists" lead us to the belief that their way is the right way. It is worthwhile Googleing Ed's articles but don't get confused with the US economics professor of the same name. This is but one article from him.
|=================================================================================
Ecology and economy are inseparable
By ED DEAK
[ED DEAK, a resident of rural British Columbia, has spent much of the past decade posting a great deal of his observations on economics from a commonsense, physical point of view. Ed is not an economist, which is a strength not a weakness as he is able, through not being indoctrinated and enmeshed in economists' makebelieve, to get straight to the physical realities behind economic life. Among other strengths he is a primary producer (taken up in retirement from small manufacturing in Vancouver) and an accomplished artist (and artists do brush aside the trivial and get to the heart of matters). Over a number of years Ed personally and avidly made a close study of the writings of the economics profession and his conclusions were bleak. One outcome of this is a regular bulletin he writes under the title Fiat Lux (Let there be light) and we publish here most of his No. 126 (minus material related only to Canada). If readers like it, let's know and we'll publish some more next time. -- Editor]
Self-sufficiency is one of the most important things in life, whether we're talking about individuals, families, societies, countries and ultimately the whole world. Anybody with the slightest intelligence should be able to see that the presently dominating neoclassical market economy theory is driving the world into poverty, destitution and self-destruction. The reasons are very logical and obvious, yet our governments are trying their best to ram this criminal theory down the public's throat on the orders of the multinational Mafia who make the largest donations to and virtually own the ruling Parties.
Both words "ecology" and "economy" originate with the ancient Greek word "oikos", meaning "household", therefore the two are inseparable. "Ecology" means the functioning and "economy" the management of the household. We can not have an economy without a functioning ecology, because all living creatures and organisms rely on some form of resource conversion for every second of their existence and it is the ecology that provides it. To preserve the sustainability of species, starting at the micro levels and overlapping into regional and global, ecologies evolved into self sustaining systems that automatically adjust and balance themselves to slow down resource conversion. At the same time human economic theories have been built on the premise of the largest possible degree of resource conversion, regardless of the ecological consequences, which is then called "wealth" in every language.
Temporary control
I define this as: "Wealth and property are the temporary control of energy and resources". As we can not create, or destroy either resources, or energy, only convert them into other forms, wealth, or profits can not be created, only taken from other sectors, or the ecology. And this causes the biggest crime waves and mass murdering rampages at every level and in every age of history, whitewashed and justified in textbooks and religions as "our glorious past".
There are hundreds and thousands of examples the consequences of failed economic theories in history with dead cities and vanished civilisations all over the world. All because they have either run out of resources they used up and wasted, or ran out of strength to steal them from others. The purpose of past colonisations with the force of arms and now with the perceived power of imaginary capital, has always been and still is the theft of resources from other parts of the world. History shows that ultimately all past colonising powers and empires have burned out and collapsed into oblivion, regardless what their rulers and priests have promised to them.
The theory of the "survival of the fittest" is total nonsense, because in an ecosystem it is not the fittest who survive, as indeed it is impossible to determine which life form is the so-called fittest -- but the species the ecology needs for its own survival to slow down resource conversion and eliminate waste, which may be at the local, area, or global levels. There's no escape from this natural law. When certain species become useless, or damaging for the survival of the ecology, the system will destroy them. It has happened to many animal species and human societies in the past and is happening to ours, regardless what some nutcase economists and politicians promise.
Every past ruling society has relied heavily on lies by their leaders and priesthoods, as we can witness it now, in our own times, while they are pushing the human race downhill into self destruction. To perpetrate their lies, ruling societies always rely heavily on phoney religious doctrines and the twisting of words and concepts into new languages to make their subjects believe that the crimes they are committing are blessed by the gods, perfectly acceptable and legal.
Our present self-destructive economic system, as in the histories of all past empires, is built on lies to legalise theft from others and the ecology. The holy trinity of the neoclassical theory, the GDP, growth and productivity, are built on the misused concept of "efficiency", which in twisted minds means the largest profits for the least monetary inputs. Of course, like every dogma of this fraudulent system the use of this word is barefaced lie.
Scientific laws sector-neutral In physics and engineering, efficiency means the most work done with the least resource and energy inputs. Scientific laws must be sector-neutral and apply equally to everything and everybody, regardless of race, colour or creed, financial, or societal standing. Scientific laws and numbers can not be made to favour any special interest group, or sector and can not be handed over to any to be used for their own benefit. The minute we open up science and physical laws to represent imaginary concepts, we are not only committing a self destructive-act, but also a crime, because then they can be used for illegal purposes as they have been through history and in our time.
Monetary values can not be used to define efficiency, because they are not realities, but often violence- induced, temporary perceptions. Neither can they be used for economic calculations, because they mean absolutely nothing and their only purpose is to mislead people and keep a self-appointed ruling class in power. As we can see it in our everyday lives, on account of this fraudulent definition of economic efficiency, the biggest crooks and con artists have the right to steal, rob, dispossess anybody of their properties, jobs, businesses and even commit mass murder many parts of the world, especially in oil-producing countries, so they can report increasing "earnings" on the stockmarkets. As the biggest criminals and murderers in history have been idolised as conquering heroes, we are now supposed to idolise the present bunch when they do the same with the perceived power of monetary capital freshly created by the banks in selected countries.
It is not funny, when we consider that banks of certain countries are permitted to create monetary capital out of the blue against and to exploit the resources of other societies, who are not permitted to benefit from what they already own. This is biggest con job in history and the perfect crime.
